|
? |
|
Accelerated Schools
Project |
||||||
|
December 1998 |
|
Dr. Henry M. Levin Visits the |
||||||
INSIDEHenry Levin................. 1 Training/Network....... 1 Logo Contest................ 1 Something to...............
1 Grant Update............... 2 Let us Know................. 2 New Associates........... 2 Excerpts....................... 2 List-Serve..................... 2 Grant Application........ 3 |
|
Dr. Henry M. Levin visited the The
next day Dr. Levin spoke with the participants of the Principal/Administrator
Institute. He first provided an historical perspective for the participants, then glanced ahead at what the future of the movement may
hold. He continued by emphasizing the changing role of
the principal and the need for district level support in order for the
implementation of the Accelerated Schools Model to truly be successful. A
rich dialogue with Dr. Levin concluded the morning session of the Institute. Our
time with Hank was most enjoyable, not to mention, educational! It was a treat to share him with several
guests and friends of Accelerated Schools as well as many of our Accelerated
school personnel from around the state. |
||||||
for Accelerated SchoolsDr. Julie K. BiddleDirector The ASP Newsletter is published quarterly by the Peg WuelfingTechnical Writer Vickie Hodges CommunicationsCoordinator |
|
Update on Training/NetworkOpportunities for 1999January 17 - 20
2nd National
Conference in ( Tuesday, April 13 (
|
|
? |
||||
Logo ContestCalling
all creative students and staffs in our Ohio Accelerated School Network – The
Satellite Center is interested in having a logo! Draw your idea of what we can use on our
letterhead, publications (like our newsletter), training materials and
brochures to represent Accelerated Schools.
All
drawings need to be submitted in black and white and camera-ready
format. Please submit your entries by |
||||||||
|
Something
to talk about . . . Kudos to Kathy Wolf and
Dave Crawford, The Family Room was one of
the “best practices” that brought Kinder
School in Miamisburg the prestigious Brad Tillson Award this past
September. “French and Spanish spoken here’ for everyone K through 5” at Dorr Elementary in Henry W. Longfellow Accelerated Learning/Extended Day Magnet School is proud of their name
change, and having met all their targets, were rated
as an “excelling school” by the State Department of Education. |
||||||||
|
|
Excerpts from “Technology is the Answer . . . and
What’s the Question?” as it appeared in the Accelerated Schools Newsletter
(Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 1, 8, 11). Many of us have gone to staff development workshops, read articles, and been counseled by well-meaning colleagues from outside of education saying, “Technology is the answer.” But the dialogue begins when we respond, “and what is the question?” Historical studies of the use of educational technology in classrooms have found that the technologies are not easily accepted by classroom teachers or adaptable to teaching and learning needs of students (Cuban 1986). And much of what teachers do goes well beyond the capabilities of even the best technological advances. The fact is that historically the abstract vision of technology as the “answer” often ends up with students sitting before video monitors doing electronic worksheets or “drill and practice” rather than paper worksheets or playing the equivalent of video-games while classroom life continues to drone on in all of its other forms. And this is especially likely to be true for students in at-risk situations. The
question posed by this issue is what should be the role of educational
technology in Accelerated Schools? The
overall answer to the question is that technology can be an extremely
valuable and effective tool when integrated into powerful learning strategies
and guided by the principles and values of accelerated schools. The best way to evaluate educational technologies for their appropriateness for Accelerated Schools is to assess their appropriateness for specific powerful learning applications as well as their compatibility with the principles and values of Accelerated Schools. It is obvious that “stand alone” technological applications do not meet the criteria of connectiveness and continuity among different learning contexts and subject areas or the promotion of knowledge in a holistic framework. They are also unlikely to be student-centered or to promote authenticity in learning activities. Technologies that treat students as passive recipients of knowledge rather than as active learners are unlikely to fulfill the requirements of powerful learning. In
a project supported by the Mott Foundation, Accelerated Schools’ researcher
Marta Forero considered how the principles and values of the We
invite schools to use the evaluation tools in the Forero paper and to share
with the |
|
Interested in theList-serve?
The
Or
to subscribe to the list- serve follow these instructions: To subscribe send
a message to MAISERLISTS.UDAYTON.EDU in the body of the message type SUBOASN.
To unsubscribe send a message to the maiser address with a message of UNSUBOASN. We hope to be able to provide the
opportunity for many interesting discussions, suggestions, new items and
research topics to the Ohio ASP. This
is confidential and not to be disseminated or provided to any other person or
party. All postings are confidential
and anonymous. If
you have questions, comments or suggestions for articles for our newsletter,
please contact: for Accelerated Schools (937) 229-4517 (937)229-3199 (FAX) mail to: biddlej@keiko.udayton.edu |
||||
|
Powerful Learning Grant Application (Only one application/school) Applicant(s) Name_____________________________________________________________________________ Home Address________________________________________________Phone___________________________ School Name__________________________________________________________________________________ School Address________________________________________________________________________________ School Phone_________________________________________________FAX_____________________________ Email address_________________________________________________________________________________ Grade Level Presently Teaching_________________________________________________________________ Number of years you have been an Accelerated Schools Coach__________________________________ (Attach additional pages if more than one individual is applying) Principal’s Signature___________________________________________________________________________ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * In 2-3 pages please · Describe completely how $500.00 will be used to enhance powerful learning opportunities for all students (include objectives of plan, implementation strategies, and timeline for implementation). · Explain how your project fits with your prescribed course of study. · Explain how the five components of powerful learning are woven into the proposed project. Awardees must agree to ·
Submit a well-produced videotape documenting
the powerful learning project described above (tape becomes property of ·
Agree to participate in a follow-up interview
with · Agree to complete an evaluation of project. Award winners may be invited to participate in local, state, and/or national presentations as well as powerful learning training. COMPLETE APPLICATION AND MAIL TO: Dayton Satellite Center for Accelerated Schools, University of Dayton, 300 College Park Drive, Dayton, OH 45469-0510. TIMELINE ·
Application deadline is · Notification of winners will be Summer 1999. · Implementation of grant is for school year, 1999-2000. ·
Videotape due at the · Interview and evaluation in June/July 2000. QUESTIONS? Contact Julie K. Biddle at 937-229-4517 or email biddlej@keiko.udayton.edu. |
On the Web
|
www.udayton.edu/edu/centers/OASN/OASN.html Massachusetts State
Department of Education – ASP Satellite Center
info.doe.mass.edu/doedocs/accelsch.html |
|